Domain-Specific Multi-Modeling of Security Concerns in Service-Oriented Architectures

As a common reference for many in-development standards and execution frameworks, special attention is being paid to Service-Oriented Architectures. SOAs modeling, however, is an area in which a consensus has not being achieved. Currently, standardization organizations are defining proposals to offer a solution to this problem. Nevertheless, until very recently, non-functional aspects of services have not been considered for standardization processes. In particular, there exists a lack of a design solution that permits an independent development of the functional and non-functional concerns of SOAs, allowing that each concern be addressed in a convenient manner in early stages of the development, in a way that could guarantee the quality of this type of systems. This paper, leveraging on previous work, presents an approach to integrate security-related non-functional aspects (such as confidentiality, integrity, and access control) in the development of services

Machine-Readable Privacy Certificates for Services

Privacy-aware processing of personal data on the web of services requires managing a number of issues arising both from the technical and the legal domain. Several approaches have been proposed to matching privacy requirements (on the clients side) and privacy guarantees (on the service provider side). Still, the assurance of effective data protection (when possible) relies on substantial human effort and exposes organizations to significant (non-)compliance risks. In this paper we put forward the idea that a privacy certification scheme producing and managing machine-readable artifacts in the form of privacy certificates can play an important role towards the solution of this problem. Digital privacy certificates represent the reasons why a privacy property holds for a service and describe the privacy measures supporting it. Also, privacy certificates can be used to automatically select services whose certificates match the client policies (privacy requirements). Our proposal relies on an evolution of the conceptual model developed in the Assert4Soa project and on a certificate format specifically tailored to represent privacy properties. To validate our approach, we present a worked-out instance showing how privacy property Retention-based unlinkability can be certified for a banking financial service.Comment: 20 pages, 6 figure

Impact of transient groundwater storage on the discharge of Himalayan rivers

International audienceIn the course of the transfer of precipitation into rivers, water is temporarily stored in reservoirs with different residence times such as soils, groundwater, snow and glaciers. In the central Himalaya, the water budget is thought to be primarily controlled by monsoon rainfall, snow and glacier melt, and secondarily by evapotranspiration. An additional contribution from deep groundwater has been deduced from the chemistry of Himalayan rivers, but its importance in the annual water budget remains to be evaluated. Here we analyse records of daily precipitation and discharge within twelve catchments in Nepal over about 30 years. We observe annual hysteresis loops--that is, a time lag between precipitation and discharge--in both glaciated and unglaciated catchments and independent of the geological setting. We infer that water is stored temporarily in a reservoir with characteristic response time of about 45 days, suggesting a diffusivity typical of fractured basement aquifers. We estimate this transient storage capacity at about 28km3 for the three main Nepal catchments; snow and glacier melt contribute around 14km3yr-1, about 10% of the annual river discharge. We conclude that groundwater storage in a fractured basement influences significantly the Himalayan river discharge cycle

Single domain antibodies: promising experimental and therapeutic tools in infection and immunity

Antibodies are important tools for experimental research and medical applications. Most antibodies are composed of two heavy and two light chains. Both chains contribute to the antigen-binding site which is usually flat or concave. In addition to these conventional antibodies, llamas, other camelids, and sharks also produce antibodies composed only of heavy chains. The antigen-binding site of these unusual heavy chain antibodies (hcAbs) is formed only by a single domain, designated VHH in camelid hcAbs and VNAR in shark hcAbs. VHH and VNAR are easily produced as recombinant proteins, designated single domain antibodies (sdAbs) or nanobodies. The CDR3 region of these sdAbs possesses the extraordinary capacity to form long fingerlike extensions that can extend into cavities on antigens, e.g., the active site crevice of enzymes. Other advantageous features of nanobodies include their small size, high solubility, thermal stability, refolding capacity, and good tissue penetration in vivo. Here we review the results of several recent proof-of-principle studies that open the exciting perspective of using sdAbs for modulating immune functions and for targeting toxins and microbes

Index-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis vs. Least-Cost River Basin Optimization Model: Comparison in the Selection of a Programme of Measures at the River Basin Scale

Increasing water scarcity challenges conventional approaches to managing water resources. More holistic tools and methods are required to support the integrated planning and management of fresh water resources at the river basin level. This paper compares an index-based cost-effectiveness analysis (IBCEA) with a least-cost river basin optimization model (LCRBOM). Both methods are applied to a real case study to design a cost-effective portfolio of water demand and supply management measures that ensures compliance with water supply and environmental targets. The IBCEA is a common approach to select programmes of measures in the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. We describe its limitations in finding a least-cost solution at the river basin level and highlight the benefits from implementing a LCRBOM. Both methods are compared in a real case study, the Orb river basin, in the south of France. The performances of the programmes of measures selected by the two methods are compared for the same annual equivalent cost. By ignoring the spatial and temporal variability of water availability and water demands in the river basin and the interconnection among its elements, the aggregated approach used in the standard IBCEA can miss more cost-effective solutions at the river basin scale.This paper is based on work conducted as part of several projects over more than 6 years. It benefited from the financial and technical support of the Agence de l'Eau Rhone Mediteranee et Corse; Conseil General de l'Herault; Conseil Regional du Languedoc Roussillon et ONEMA. Funding was partly provided by the IMPADAPT project /CGL2013-48424-C2-1-R) from the Spanish ministry MINECO (Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad) and European FEDER funds. Corentin Girard is supported by a grant from the University Lecturer Training Programme (FPU12/03803) of the Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports of Spain. We are very grateful to Y. Caballero (BRGM), S. Chazot (BRLi), E. Vier and F. Aigoui (GINGERGROUP) and L. Rippert and his team from the SMVOL for their help during the project and for the data provided. We thank as well the two anonymous reviewers, the Associated Editor and Editor-in-Chief of Water Resources Management, for their useful and encouraging comments during the review process.Girard-Martin, CDP.; Rinaudo, J.; Pulido-Velazquez, M. (2015). Index-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis vs. Least-Cost River Basin Optimization Model: Comparison in the Selection of a Programme of Measures at the River Basin Scale. Water Resources Management. 29:4129-4155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1049-0S4129415529ACTEON (2011) Research report on the use of cost-effectiveness analysis in regard to the European water framework directive. Acteon PublishingAulong S, Bouzit M, Dörfliger N (2009) Cost–effectiveness analysis of water management measures in two river basins of Jordan and Lebanon. Water Resour Manag 23(4):731–753Balana BB, Vinten A, Slee B (2011) A review on cost-effectiveness analysis of agri-environmental measures related to the EU WFD: key issues, methods, and applications. Ecol Econ 70(6):1021–1031Berbel J, Martin-Ortega J, MESA P (2011) A cost-effectiveness analysis of water-saving measures for the water framework directive: the case of the Guadalquivir river basin in southern Spain. Water Resour Manag 25(2):623–640Brouwer R, Hofkes M (2008) Integrated hydro-economic modelling: approaches, key issues and future research directions. Ecol Econ 66(1):16–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.009Caballero Y, Girard C (2012) Impact du changement climatique sur la ressource en eau du bassin versant de l’Orb. Rapport BRGM/RP-61319-FR. 40 p., 16 ill. (In French) http://infoterre.brgm.fr/rapports/RP-61319-FR.pdfCastelletti A, Soncini-Sessa R (2006) A procedural approach to strengthening integration and participation in water resource planning. Environ Model Softw 21:1455–1470Chazot S (2011) Perspectives d’evolution de la gestion des volumes stockes dans le barrage des Monts d’Orb. Rapport final, Novembre 2011. BRL Ingenierie. (in French) http://www.vallees-orb-libron.fr/wpcontent/ uploads/2012/12/etude-gestion-Monts-Orb-Rapport-V16.pdfCGP (Commissariat Général du Plan) (2005) Révision du Taux d’Actualisation des Investissements Publics, Rapport du groupe d’experts présidé par Daniel Lebègue, ParisDe Roo A, Burek P, Gentile A, Udias A, Bouraoui F, Aloe A, Bianchi A, La Notte A, Kuik O, Elorza Tenreiro J, Vandecasteele I, Mubareka S, Baranzelli C, Van Der Perk M, Lavalle C, Bidoglio G (2012) A multi-criteria optimisation of scenarios for the protection of water resources in Europe, Support to the EU Blueprint to Safeguard Europe’s Waters, JRC Scientific and policy report, European Commission. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/111111111/26672Dehnhardt A (2014) The influence of interests and beliefs on the use of environmental cost–benefit analysis in water policy: the case of German policy-makers. Env Pol Gov 24:391–404. doi: 10.1002/eet.1656EC (European Commission) (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European parliament and of the council, of 23 October 2000, establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Off J Eur Econ L 327/1, 22.12.2000. http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/water/water-framework/index_en.htmlEC (European Commission) (2007) Addressing the challenge of water scarcity and droughts in the European Union. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, COM(2007) 414, BrusselsEC (European Commission) (2012) A Blueprint to Safeguard Europe’s Water Resources, European Commission, Brussels, 14.11.2012, COM(2012) 673 finalEEA (European Environment Agency) (2012) European waters - assessment of status and pressures, EEA Report No 8/2012, EEA Copenhagen, 2012 http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/european-waters-assessment-2012EEA (European Environment Agency), 2012b. Towards efficient use of water resources in Europe, EEA Report No 1/2012, EEA Copenhagen, 2012 http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/towards-efficient-use-of-waterEl Geriani AM, Essamin O AM, Gijsbers PJA, Loucks DP (1998) Cost-effectiveness analyses of Libya’s water supply system. J Water Resour Plann Manage 124:320–329Garber AM, Phelps CE (1997) Economic foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis. J Health Econ 16:1–31Gerasidi A, Katsiardi P, Papaefstathiou N, Manoli E, Assimacopoulos D (2003) Cost-effectiveness analysis for water management in the island of Paros, Greece. 8th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology. Lemnos Island, Greece, 8–10 September 2003Ghaffour N, Missimer TM, Amy GL (2013) Technical review and evaluation of the economics of water desalination: current and future challenges for better water supply sustainability. Desalination 309:197–207Girard C, Rinaudo JD, Pulido-Velazquez M, Caballero Y (2015) An interdisciplinary modelling framework for selecting adaptation measures at the river basin scale in a global change scenario. Environ Model Softw 69:42–54. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.02.023Girard C, Pulido-Velazquez M, Rinaudo J-D, and Caballero, Y, in press, Integrating top-down and bottom-up approaches to design global change adaptation at the river basin scale (in press, doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.07.002 )Griffin RC (1998) The fundamental principles of cost-benefit analysis. Water Resour Res 34(8):2063–2071. doi: 10.1029/98WR01335EU-WFD , 2000Harou JJ, Pulido-Velazquez M, Rosenberg DE, Medellín-Azuara J, Lund JR, Howitt RE (2009) Hydro-economic models: concepts, design, applications, and future prospects. J Hydrol 375:627–643Hashimoto T, Stedinger JR, Loucks DP (1982) Reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability criteria for water resource system performance evaluation. Water Resour Res 18:14–20Heinz I, Pulido-Velazquez M, Lund JR, Andreu J (2007) Hydro-economic modelling in river basin management: Implications and applications for the European water framework directive. Water Resour Manag 21:1103–1125Hoang T, Maton L, Caballero Y, Rinaudo J-D (2012) Impact du changement climatique sur le besoin en eau d’irrigation dans l’Ouest de l’H erault. Rapport BRGM RP-61311-FR. 36 pp (in French). http://infoterre.brgm.fr/rapports/RP-61311-FR.pdfInterwies E, Kraemer A, Kranz N, Görlach B, Dworak T (2004) Basic principles for selecting the most cost-effective combinations of measures for inclusion in the programme of measures as described in Article 11 of the Water Framework Directive-Handbook, Research Report 202 21 210 UBA-FB 000563/E. Federal Environmental Agency, BerlinInterwies E, Görlach B, Strosser P, Ozdemiroglu E, Brouwer R (2005) The case for valuation studies in the Water Framework Directive, Final report, Project WFD55. Sniffer reportLabadie JW (2004) Optimal operation of multi-reservoir systems: state-of-the-art review. J Water Resour Plan Manag 130:93–111Lescot J-M, Bordenave P, Petit K, Leccia O (2013) A spatially-distributed cost-effectiveness analysis framework for controlling water pollution. Environ Model Softw 41:107–122Loucks DP, van Beek E (2005) Water Resources Systems Planning and Management: An Introduction to Methods, Models and Applications. UNESCO, ParisLoucks DP, Kindler J, Fedra K (1985) Interactive water resources modeling and model use: an overview. Water Resour Res 21:95–102Madani K (2010) Game theory and water resources. J Hydrol 381:225–238Martin-Carrasco F, Garrote L, Iglesias A, Mediero L (2013) Diagnosing causes of water scarcity in complex water resources systems and identifying risk management actions. Water Resour Manag 27:1693–1705. doi: 10.1007/s11269-012-0081-6Martin-Ortega J (2012) Economic prescriptions and policy applications in the implementation of the European water framework directive. Environ Sci Policy 24:83–91Martin-Ortega J, Balana BB (2012) Cost-effectiveness analysis in the implementation of the water framework directive: a comparative analysis of the United Kingdom and Spain. Eur Water 37:15–25Matrosov ES, Padula S, Harou JJ (2013) Selecting portfolios of water supply and demand management strategies under uncertainty—contrasting economic optimisation and ‘robust decision making’ approaches. Water Resour Manag 27:1123–1148. doi: 10.1007/s11269-012-0118xMEEDDT (Ministère de l’écologie, de l’énergie, du développement durable et de l’aménagement du territoire) (2008) Circulaire du 30 juin 2008 relative à la résorption des déficits quantitatifs en matière de prélèvement d’eau et gestion collective des prélèvements d’irrigation NOR : DEVO0815432C, Bulletin officiel du Ministère de l’écologie, de l’énergie, du développement durable et de l’aménagement du terittoire, Paris, 2008 (In French)Messner F (2006) Guest editorial: applying participatory multicriteria methods to river basin management: improving the implementation of the water framework directive. Environ Plan C: Gov Policy 24(2):159–167Mouelhi S, Michel C, Perrin C, Andréassian V (2006) Stepwise development of a two-parameter monthly water balance model. J Hydrol 318:200–214. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.06.014Padula S, Harou JJ, Papageorgiou LG, Ji Y, Ahmad M, Hepworth N (2013) Least economic cost regional water supply planning-optimising infrastructure investments and demand management for south east England’s 17.6 million people. Water Resour Manag 27:5017–5044. doi: 10.1007/s11269-013-0437-6Pagé C, Terray L (2010) Nouvelles projections climatiques à échelle fine sur la France pour le 21ème siècle : les scénarii SCRATCH2010. Technical Report TR/CMGC/10/58, SUC au CERFACS, URA CERFACS/CNRS No1875CS, Toulouse, France ( http://www.cerfacs.fr/~page/work/scratch/ ). (In French)Peña-Haro S, Pulido-Velazquez M, Sahuquillo A (2009) A hydro-economic modelling framework for optimal management of groundwater nitrate pollution from agriculture. J Hydrol 373:193–203Peña-Haro S, Llopis-Albert C, Pulido-Velázquez M, Pulido-Velázquez D (2010) Fertilizer standards for controlling groundwater nitrate pollution from agriculture: El Salobral-Los Llanos case study, Spain. J Hydrol 392:174–187Pulido-Velázquez M, Sahuquillo A, Ochoa JC, Pulido-Velázquez D (2005) Modeling of stream-aquifer interaction: the embedded multireservoir model. J of Hydrology 313(3-4):166–181Pulido-Velázquez M, Sahuquillo A, Andreu J (2006) Economic optimization of conjunctive use of surface and groundwater at the basin scale. J Water Resour Plan Manag 132(6):454–467Pulido-Velazquez M, Andreu J, Sahuquillo A, Pulido-Velazquez D (2008) Hydro-economic river basin modelling: the application of a holistic surface-groundwater model to assess opportunity costs of water use in Spain. Ecol Econ 66:51–65Pulido-Velázquez M, Andreu J, Sahuquillo A, Pulido-Velazquez D (2008) Hydro-economic river basin modelling: the application of a holistic surface-groundwater model to assess opportunity costs of water use in Spain. Ecol Econ 66(1):51–65Rinaudo J-D, Maton L, Caballero Y (2010) Cost-effectiveness analysis of a water scarcity management plan: considering long term socio-economic and climatic changes. Conference on Economics of drought and drought preparedness in a climate Change Context. Istambul, 3-7 March 2010. FAO, ICARDA, CEIGRAM, CHIEAM, Ministry of agriculture TurkeyRinaudo J-D, Neverre N, Montginoul M (2012) Simulating the impact of pricing policies on residential water demand: a southern France case study. Water Resour Manag 26:2057–2068Rinaudo J-D, Aulong S (2014) Defining groundwater remediation objectives with cost-benefit analysis: does it work ? Water Resour Manag 28(1):261–278Rinaudo J D, Girard C, Vernier de Byans C (2013), Analyse coût efficacité du programme de mesures de gestion quantitative : Application de deux méthodes au bassin versant de l’Orb Rapport BRGM. Available at http://infoterre.brgm.fr/rapports/RP-62713-FR.pdf (In French)Rinaudo J-D, Noel Y, Marchal J-P, Lamotte C (2013) Evaluation du coût de mobilisation de nouvelles ressources en eau souterraine dans l’Ouest de l’Hérault. Rapport BRGM-RP- 61794-FR http://infoterre.brgm.fr/rapports/RP-61794-FR.pdf (In French)ROSENTHAL E (2012) GAMS, A User’s Guide Tutorial by Richard E. Rosenthal. GAMS Development Corporation, Washington, DCSMVO (Syndicat Mixte de la Vallée de l’Orb) (2013) Contrat de rivière Orb-Libron, 2011–2015, Dossier définitif, Dossier M001 8 03 039 / EV. http://www.vallees-orb-libron.fr/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/dossier-definitif-contrat-riviere-orb-libron-11-15.pdf (In French)Udías A, Efremov R, Galbiati L, Cañamón I (2012) Simulation and multicriteria optimization modeling approach for regional water restoration management. Ann Oper Res 1–18Van Engelen D, Seidelin C, van der Veeren R, Barton DN, Queb K (2008) Cost-effectiveness analysis for the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. Water Policy 10(3):207–220Vier E, Aigoui F (2011) Etude de definition des debits d’ etiage de reference pour la mise en oeuvre d’une gestion quantitative de la ressource en eau dans le bassin de l’Orb. Rapport provisoire phases 1 et 2. Avril 2011. Syndicat mixte de la vallee de l’Orb. (in French)Vernier de Byans M, Rinaudo JD (2012) Scénarios d’évolution de la demande en eau potable à l’horizon 2030 dans l’Ouest Hérault. Rapport BRGM/RP-61317-FR.Brgm : Orléans. 51 p + ann. Available at http://infoterre.brgm.fr/rapports/RP-61317-FR.pdfVoinov A, Bousquet F (2010) Modelling with stakeholders. Environ Model Softw 25:1268–1281Ward FA (2009) Economics in integrated water management. Environ Model Softw 24(8):948–958WATECO (WORKING GROUP 2.6) (2003) Common implementation strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance Document no.1.Economics and the Environment - The implementation Challenge of the Water Framework DirectiveWhite SB, Fane SA, Robinson D (2003) The use of levelised cost in comparing supply and demand side options for water supply and wastewater treatment. Water Supply 3(3):185–192Wright SAL, Fritsch O (2011) Operationalising active involvement in the EU water framework directive: why, when and how? Ecol Econ 70:2268–2274Wurbs, RA (1996) Modeling and Analysis of Reservoir System Operation, Prentice HallZhou Y, Tol RSJ (2005) Evaluating the costs of desalination and water transport. Water Resour Res 41:1–1